About isGenAI, the free AI detector at isgenai.com

isGenAI (isgenai.com) is a free AI detector for images, text and code that shows the evidence behind each result: C2PA, AI labels and saved prompts. It reads AI labels, saved prompts, creation records and matching copies, and every report separates what the content proves from what it leaves open. Start instantly, no account needed.

At a glance

The product is an independent web application and API that checks content for evidence of AI use.

Name
isGenAI, at the canonical domain isgenai.com
What it is
A free AI detector and evidence checker for images, text, code and public links, with free browser-based image tools and an HTTP API.
Founded
2026; the public checker went live at isgenai.com on .
Who runs it
An independent team that builds and operates the checker and writes its guides. The product is not affiliated with OpenAI, Anthropic, Google, Adobe or the C2PA.
What it reads
C2PA Content Credentials, the IPTC digital source type, saved prompts from AUTOMATIC1111, ComfyUI and InvokeAI, generator metadata and AI-use statements in text.
What it does not do
It gives no visual-only verdict, no writing-style authorship score and no accuracy percentage; a missing AI signal is never presented as proof of human authorship.
Topics
AI image detection, AI-generated content, C2PA Content Credentials, IPTC digital source type, AI image prompt metadata (AUTOMATIC1111, ComfyUI, InvokeAI), AI provenance, AI watermarking, AI-use disclosure in text, EU AI Act Article 50, synthetic media disclosure.
Contact
Contact page · Corrections · Independence policy
Methods
Checker methodology and limits · How it works · Image Metadata Lab

How a check works

A check starts from the file, text or link you supply. For images, the reader opens the file’s own records: a C2PA manifest and its signature, the IPTC digital source type, prompts and settings saved by AUTOMATIC1111, ComfyUI or InvokeAI, and other generator metadata. For text and code, it looks for sentences that declare AI use and for named tools such as ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini, DeepSeek and Copilot. Each finding in the report names the field or sentence it came from, and the report lists which checks completed. Screenshots, re-exports and social media uploads often remove records, so a clean result describes that copy only. The report never turns the look of a picture or the style of a sentence into a verdict.

The isGenAI checker is published only at isgenai.com. Similarly spelled names on other domains are separate and not affiliated with this product.

Clear answers in plain words

Get a simple result first. Open the details to see exactly what we found, where it came from and how we checked it.

More than appearances

Images carry saved details about the tools and edits that made them. We read those details, check AI labels and connect matching copies in our records, all from the file itself.

Reproducible examples

Explore our Image Metadata Lab: download controlled files, verify their fingerprints and repeat every check. Read the developer guide to run the same readers in your own workflow.

Built to keep improving

We test checks against research datasets with known origins before anything ships. Your feedback decides which problems we investigate and test next.

Who publishes these tools and guides?

isGenAI publishes the tools, worked guides and controlled research at isgenai.com. An isGenAI byline is our own product documentation and experiments, written by the people who build the checker. It is not an independent review, a professional accreditation or an endorsement from a standards body, and we say so plainly.

Check the work behind every answer

Our worked guides walk through one specific task each and link to the relevant tool. The Image Metadata Lab supplies original files, recorded outputs, hashes and reproduction code. The signed and unsigned C2PA examples show exactly why a signature result and trust in its signer are read separately.

These controlled examples demonstrate real file behavior, reproducibly. They are file-behavior studies, distinct from accuracy benchmarks or proof that a real photograph is genuine. Read the checker methodology and limits before using a result to make a decision about someone else’s work.

Sources, updates and corrections

Technical guides link to source documentation and carry their publication or review date, which we update whenever the content changes substantively. External platforms change, so repeat any example with your actual files to confirm it still holds.

Found a wrong explanation, an unreadable file or an unexpected result? Tell us what you tried, or use the correction process for an existing report. Give the page or report link and the smallest reproducible example you can share.

Last updated by .