interaction disclosure
PROVIDER / externally testableEU AI Act Article 50
Evidence for EU AI Act Article 50 transparency.
isGenAI connects official EU AI Act Article 50 transparency requirements to independent public observations, scorecards, findings, evidence and change history for AI products.
Product ratings are awaiting supporting evidence.
Public website wording alone cannot establish whether generated outputs are marked or whether disclosure works in a product flow. Ratings and findings are withheld until the evidence supports those checks. The scanners and official source links remain available.
Control families
What EU AI Act Article 50 covers in isGenAI
isGenAI models EU AI Act Article 50(1), 50(2), 50(3), 50(4) and 50(5), with 50(5) treated as cross-cutting clarity and accessibility.
machine readable marking
PROVIDER / externally testableemotion biometric notice
DEPLOYER / requires contextdeepfake public interest label
DEPLOYER / externally testableclarity accessibility timing
BOTH / externally testableRecently assessed
AI products with public scorecards
Recent findings
EU AI Act Article 50-related observations
Implementation guides and tools
Specific EU AI Act Article 50 questions
Each guide links back to real scorecards and tools where isGenAI has data or a working scanner.
Sources
Official source registry
isGenAI observations are separated from official requirements and vendor-submitted evidence.
For a procurement workflow, see AI vendor risk assessment and AI vendor due diligence. Keep a vendor’s public claims separate from evidence you obtain through testing.