Evidence for EU AI Act Article 50 transparency.

isGenAI connects official EU AI Act Article 50 transparency requirements to independent public observations, scorecards, findings, evidence and change history for AI products.

Product ratings are awaiting supporting evidence.

Public website wording alone cannot establish whether generated outputs are marked or whether disclosure works in a product flow. Ratings and findings are withheld until the evidence supports those checks. The scanners and official source links remain available.

0Published scorecards
0Evidence records
0Visible findings shown
0Changes this week

What EU AI Act Article 50 covers in isGenAI

isGenAI models EU AI Act Article 50(1), 50(2), 50(3), 50(4) and 50(5), with 50(5) treated as cross-cutting clarity and accessibility.

EU AI Act Article 50(1)

interaction disclosure

PROVIDER / externally testable
EU AI Act Article 50(2)

machine readable marking

PROVIDER / externally testable
EU AI Act Article 50(3)

emotion biometric notice

DEPLOYER / requires context
EU AI Act Article 50(4)

deepfake public interest label

DEPLOYER / externally testable
EU AI Act Article 50(5)

clarity accessibility timing

BOTH / externally testable

AI products with public scorecards

EU AI Act Article 50-related observations

Specific EU AI Act Article 50 questions

Each guide links back to real scorecards and tools where isGenAI has data or a working scanner.

Official source registry

isGenAI observations are separated from official requirements and vendor-submitted evidence.

For a procurement workflow, see AI vendor risk assessment and AI vendor due diligence. Keep a vendor’s public claims separate from evidence you obtain through testing.