EU AI Act Article 50
AI-generated content marking under EU AI Act Article 50
Ship AI-generated content that meets both halves of the law: machine-readable marking from the provider and visible disclosure from the deployer.
The obligation
What the law requires
Article 50(2) puts machine-readable marking on the provider. Article 50(4) puts visible disclosure on the deployer: deepfakes must be labelled as artificially generated or manipulated, and AI-generated text published to inform the public on matters of public interest must be disclosed unless it passed human review with editorial responsibility.
The evidence
What proves it
isGenAI measures the visible label, the publication workflow, the review gate and the machine-readable mark on the same output, so one scorecard shows whether a product satisfies both obligations in practice.
Official source text, public technical observations, vendor-submitted evidence and external inference are always kept apart. A missing public signal is recorded as NOT OBSERVED, a technical fact, never as a legal finding.
Live measurements
Observations from public scorecards
0 published observations for this topic under isgenai-methodology-2026-08-16.v1, each a dated technical observation with linked evidence. Legal applicability stays with counsel.
Observations publish the moment they clear the evidence gate. Output marking is verified on generated artifacts and disclosure inside the real user workflow, never from a marketing page alone.
Findings
Related public findings
Findings appear here as soon as a published scorecard records one for this topic.
Official sources
Cite the text, not the summary
Every page is written for citation: subject, date, method, sample, result and limitation are all extractable.