How isGenAI measures EU AI Act Article 50 transparency.

isGenAI is an external public-evidence rating system with a published, versioned method. It records what is independently observable, what requires context and what changed over time, so every grade can be reproduced and challenged.

V1Methodology version
2026Scanner registry
5EU AI Act Article 50 control families
5Standardized checks

Eight precise statuses instead of one blunt verdict.

Observed status is always separate from legal compliance. isGenAI never collapses ambiguous public evidence into a binary claim.

VERIFIED

Public evidence directly supports the EU AI Act Article 50 observation.

PARTIAL

Some public signal exists, but it is incomplete, narrow or implementation-limited.

NOT OBSERVED

The scan observed no public signal. A technical fact, never a legal non-compliance finding.

UNVERIFIABLE

The control sits beyond what external testing can verify from public evidence.

VENDOR VERIFIED

Vendor-submitted evidence passed isGenAI review and is marked vendor-originated.

DISPUTED

A correction or dispute is open and the affected observation is flagged for everyone to see.

NOT APPLICABLE

The control does not apply to the assessed product context.

REQUIRES CONTEXT

Legal or deployment context must be supplied before an external inference is fair.

Score, grade and confidence

VERIFIED and VENDOR VERIFIED count as 1. PARTIAL counts as 0.5. NOT OBSERVED counts as 0. UNVERIFIABLE, REQUIRES CONTEXT, DISPUTED and NOT APPLICABLE are excluded from the denominator.

A90-100
B80-89
C70-79
D60-69
E50-59
F0-49

Confidence is calculated separately from the rating using direct testability, evidence completeness, scanner confidence, freshness and excluded-control share.

Controls included

EU AI Act Article 50(1)INTERACTION DISCLOSUREPROVIDER / externally testable
EU AI Act Article 50(2)MACHINE READABLE MARKINGPROVIDER / externally testable
EU AI Act Article 50(3)EMOTION BIOMETRIC NOTICEDEPLOYER / context required
EU AI Act Article 50(4)DEEPFAKE PUBLIC INTEREST LABELDEPLOYER / externally testable
EU AI Act Article 50(5)CLARITY ACCESSIBILITY TIMINGBOTH / externally testable

EU AI Act Article 50(5) is treated as a cross-cutting clarity, timing, distinguishability and accessibility requirement, not a separate marking obligation.

Versioned source registry

Every assessment stores its raw observations and the derived rating together with the methodology and scanner versions, so any grade can be traced to its sources.

50(1)

isGenAI records externally observable technical evidence and separates legal applicability from public observations.

EXTERNALLY_TESTABLE / reviewed 2026-08-16
50(2)

Machine-readable marking is modality-specific; isGenAI records observed mechanisms and tested persistence, not universal robustness claims.

EXTERNALLY_TESTABLE / reviewed 2026-08-16
50(3)

isGenAI records externally observable technical evidence and separates legal applicability from public observations.

CONTEXT_REQUIRED / reviewed 2026-08-16
50(4)

isGenAI records externally observable technical evidence and separates legal applicability from public observations.

EXTERNALLY_TESTABLE / reviewed 2026-08-16
50(5)

isGenAI records externally observable technical evidence and separates legal applicability from public observations.

PARTIALLY_TESTABLE / reviewed 2026-08-16

Every indexed scorecard has cleared the evidence gate.

A public scorecard needs a canonical organization, product classification, official domain, standardized scan, evidence records, methodology version and publication review before it is indexable. No exceptions.

A failed fetch, access challenge or empty page extract never supports a public grade. Scored output-marking checks require an artifact inspection, because marketing language establishes nothing about whether marking is present or absent. Verified accessibility and timing require evidence from an accessibility check or a reviewed workflow. Assessments without that evidence are retained for review while their ratings and related public findings stay withheld, which is exactly what makes a published grade credible.