EU AI Act Article 50
EU AI Act Article 50(3) emotion and biometric notice
Everything a deployer needs to satisfy Article 50(3): the notice, its placement at first exposure, the privacy-law processing record and the exception file.
The obligation
What the law requires
Article 50(3) requires deployers of emotion recognition or biometric categorisation systems to inform the natural persons exposed to them that the system is operating, and to process personal data in line with EU data-protection law. The law-enforcement exception is narrow and must be recorded.
The evidence
What proves it
This control lives inside the deployer's workflow, so isGenAI records it as context required until the deployer supplies the workflow classification, notice copy version, exposure timestamp and privacy record reference through authorized evidence submission. Once supplied, each item becomes a dated, reviewable evidence record.
Official source text, public technical observations, vendor-submitted evidence and external inference are always kept apart. A missing public signal is recorded as NOT OBSERVED, a technical fact, never as a legal finding.
Live measurements
Observations from public scorecards
0 published observations for this topic under isgenai-methodology-2026-08-16.v1, each a dated technical observation with linked evidence. Legal applicability stays with counsel.
Observations publish the moment they clear the evidence gate. Output marking is verified on generated artifacts and disclosure inside the real user workflow, never from a marketing page alone.
Findings
Related public findings
Findings appear here as soon as a published scorecard records one for this topic.
Official sources
Cite the text, not the summary
Every page is written for citation: subject, date, method, sample, result and limitation are all extractable.